Federal High Court in Abuja grants Hon. Amobi Ogah permission to compel INEC to prosecute Minister Nkeiruka Onyejeocha over alleged forgery of election results.
CourtMandamusOrder has stirred political and legal attention as the Federal High Court in Abuja granted Hon. Amobi Godwin Ogah, the lawmaker representing Isikwuato/Umunneochi Federal Constituency of Abia State, permission to compel the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to prosecute the Minister of State for Labour, Nkeiruka Onyejeocha, over alleged forgery of election results.
Delivering the ruling on September 23, 2025, Justice M.G. Umar held that Ogah had presented sufficient evidence to justify the court’s decision to grant leave for the application.
Background of the Case
Nkeiruka Onyejeocha, who contested the 2023 general elections under the All Progressives Congress (APC), had earlier taken Ogah of the Labour Party (LP) before the National and State Houses of Assembly Election Petition Tribunal, claiming she was the rightful winner of the election.
However, Ogah alleged that Onyejeocha submitted forged election results as evidence before the tribunal — a case she ultimately lost.
In April 2025, Onyejeocha, through her media aide, dismissed the allegations as baseless and long resolved, insisting that “all the allegations in the petition are false and have already been trashed out.”
Ogah’s Legal Action
Despite her denial, Ogah approached the Federal High Court, seeking permission to file for an Order of Mandamus compelling INEC to investigate and prosecute Onyejeocha for allegedly forging election materials.
According to Ogah, after he was officially declared winner by INEC, “Hon. Nkeiruka Onyejeocha forged results from several polling units and tendered them as evidence during the tribunal hearings to support her petition.”
He further claimed that Onyejeocha forged Exhibit 3, passing it off as official INEC documents, and attempted to mislead the judiciary by presenting the same forged materials before both the Election Tribunal and the Court of Appeal.
Court’s Ruling
In his ruling, Justice Umar stated that the application had merit and that the court must act with fairness and discretion.
“I have carefully considered Order 34, Rules 1, 3, and 4 of the Federal High Court (Civil Procedure) Rules, 2019, upon which this motion is based,” the judge said. “It is clear that the court’s discretion must be exercised judicially and judiciously.”
He concluded:
Implications
The ruling marks a significant legal development in the post-election disputes arising from the 2023 general elections, potentially setting a precedent for accountability in electoral litigation.
If INEC proceeds with prosecution, the case could test the boundaries of electoral integrity and ministerial accountability in Nigeria’s democratic process.