Connect with us

News

DStvPremiumCrisis: MultiChoice Faces Backlash Over Decoder Subsidies and Tier Upgrade

Phinadon Mag

Published

on

Quick Summary:
DStvPremiumCrisis as MultiChoice reintroduces decoder subsidies and launches a temporary tier upgrade for lower-tier subscribers, leaving DStv Premium customers dissatisfied amid efforts to stabilise its declining subscriber base before Canal+ reporting in 2026.

MultiChoice, the parent company of DStv, is facing growing criticism from its Premium subscribers after unveiling a new promotional strategy that excludes them from recent benefits. The company’s decision to offer a temporary content upgrade to lower-tier customers, alongside a return to decoder subsidies, has reignited debate about its pricing model, customer retention strategy, and long-term sustainability.

Decoder Subsidies Return Amid Subscriber Decline

After years of phasing out decoder subsidies, MultiChoice has reversed course, reintroducing them across South Africa and the Rest of Africa (RoA). The move comes as the company struggles with a sharp decline in DStv subscriber numbers, particularly in the Premium segment, which has seen mass cancellations due to rising costs and increased competition from streaming platforms.

The new subsidy programme, which began on 1 November, reduces the retail price of DStv decoders, making them more affordable for new and returning customers. MultiChoice hopes that this will translate into higher decoder sales and longer-term active subscriptions, especially within the 90-day reporting window used to measure active users.

While the subsidies may temporarily boost subscriber numbers, analysts warn that they could strain profit margins and inflate short-term costs, especially as MultiChoice continues to face currency volatility and declining advertising revenue.

Temporary Tier Upgrade Excludes Premium Subscribers

Between 10 November and 31 December, DStv decoder customers will gain access to the TV channels of one higher-tiered package at no additional cost. However, DStv Premium subscribers, who already pay for the top-tier package, are excluded from the promotion.

This exclusion has sparked frustration among Premium customers, who argue that they are being penalised for loyalty while lower-tier subscribers enjoy added value.

The decision has intensified the perception that MultiChoice is prioritising short-term subscriber growth over customer satisfaction, particularly among its most valuable user base.

Byron du Plessis on the “Upsize” Campaign

Byron du Plessis, CEO for pay-TV South Africa at MultiChoice, described the November–December promotion as part of a “broader plan to improve customer value” for DStv subscribers.

However, it remains unclear how this broader plan benefits DStv Premium subscribers, who are already the company’s most valuable consumers and largest contributors to ARPU (average revenue per unit).

Analysts warn that the campaign could backfire, as some Premium subscribers may downgrade or cancel their subscriptions after seeing lower-tier customers receive free upgrades.

Relaunch of DStv’s Online Store

MultiChoice also announced plans to relaunch its online store later this month, though details remain scarce. The company previously operated an online platform, but little is known about its performance or product offerings.

According to du Plessis, the relaunch forms part of MultiChoice’s broader digital strategy to enhance accessibility and convenience for customers.

Strategic Timing Before Canal+ Reporting

The timing of MultiChoice’s latest initiatives coincides with the Canal+ Africa takeover process. MultiChoice was initially expected to release its half-year financial results on 12 November, but the requirement was waived following the acquisition developments.

Industry analysts believe that MultiChoice and Canal+ are buying time to improve subscriber metrics before the next official reporting period in 2026.

By pushing decoder sales and offering temporary incentives, the companies hope to stabilise or slightly increase subscriber numbers, even if the short-term financial impact of subsidies appears negative on the balance sheet.

The Premium Subscriber Exodus

The DStv Premium tier, once the company’s flagship product, has been hardest hit by subscriber losses. Many long-time customers have migrated to streaming services such as Showmax, Netflix, and Amazon Prime Video, citing cost concerns, limited exclusive content, and repetitive programming.

MultiChoice’s decision not to reward Premium subscribers during the current promotion has further alienated this group, reinforcing the perception that the company is out of touch with its core audience.

Market Implications and Consumer Sentiment

The reintroduction of decoder subsidies and the selective tier upgrade reflect MultiChoice’s urgent need to stabilise its subscriber base amid growing competition and economic pressure. However, the strategy also exposes the company’s struggle to balance affordability with profitability.

While the short-term promotions may attract new users, analysts caution that sustained growth will depend on content innovation, pricing flexibility, and digital transformation.

Consumer sentiment remains mixed. Some applaud the company’s efforts to make DStv more accessible, while others view the move as a desperate attempt to mask deeper structural challenges.

Looking Ahead

As MultiChoice and Canal+ prepare for the next reporting cycle in 2026, the success of these initiatives will depend on whether they can convert short-term promotions into long-term loyalty.

The company faces a delicate balancing act: retaining high-value Premium customers while expanding its lower-tier base through affordability and accessibility.

If the current strategy fails to reverse the decline, MultiChoice may need to rethink its entire business model, including how it rewards loyalty, structures pricing, and competes in an increasingly digital entertainment landscape.

News

Atiku Accuses Tinubu Administration of Neglecting Retired Police Officers.

Ikechukwu Emmanuel

Published

on

Former Vice President Atiku Abubakar has criticised President Bola Tinubu’s administration over the alleged poor treatment of retired police officers, warning that many former members of the force are facing hunger, illness and humiliation after decades of service.

Atiku’s comments followed reports of protests by retired police officers at the National Assembly. The retirees, accompanied by their wives and children, reportedly called for legislative action to improve their welfare and secure better pension arrangements.

In a statement issued by his spokesperson, Phrank Shaibu, Atiku said the condition of retired police personnel reflected a broader failure to honour the sacrifices made by those who served the country. He alleged that some serving officers were also being forced to draw from their pension savings to feed their families.

The former vice president specifically called for an immediate response to the Police Exit Bill, which is intended to address the welfare and retirement conditions of police officers. He also demanded an urgent review of police salaries, particularly following the recent pay increase approved for members of the Armed Forces.

According to Atiku, a retired Assistant Superintendent of Police told him that he received a monthly pension of only N29,000. The former vice president questioned how anyone could meet basic needs on such an amount, adding that the retiree disclosed that more than 120 members of his association had died within the past three years.

“‘What would you even buy with N29,000?’ he asked,” Atiku reportedly said, urging President Tinubu to engage directly with retired officers and hear their concerns.

Atiku also recounted the case of a retired female Assistant Commissioner of Police who allegedly sought menial employment after years of service. He said she was later found begging at the Central Mosque in Abuja, prompting one of his media managers to bring the situation to his attention.

Although assistance was provided to the woman, Atiku argued that private intervention could not substitute for a functional and dependable pension system. He said former officers should not have to rely on charity or chance encounters to receive the support they had earned through public service.

The former vice president expressed particular concern that a woman who had risen to the rank of Assistant Commissioner of Police could be reduced to begging. He questioned why she had to be discovered in distress before receiving help, insisting that the state had a responsibility to protect its former personnel.

Atiku’s remarks have renewed debate over the welfare of Nigeria’s police officers, both serving and retired. The controversy also highlights longstanding concerns about inadequate pensions, delayed benefits and the disparity between the compensation of police personnel and other security agencies.

The call for action places pressure on the Federal Government and the National Assembly to address the Police Exit Bill and review the broader welfare framework for officers. For many retired police officers, however, the issue is not merely legislative. It is a demand for dignity, financial security and recognition after years of service to the nation.

Continue Reading

News

Presidency Accuses Makinde of Making False Claims Over NLNG Dividends

Ikechukwu Emmanuel

Published

on

The Presidency has dismissed a claim by Oyo State Governor Seyi Makinde that the Federal Government is withholding ₦250 billion in Nigeria Liquefied Natural Gas (NLNG) dividends for each state in the federation.

In a statement issued on Sunday, the President’s Special Adviser on Information and Strategy, Bayo Onanuga, described the claim as false and urged Nigerians to disregard it. The Presidency said the figure cited by the governor was inconsistent with the historical dividend payments made by NLNG to the Federation Account.

Makinde reportedly made the claim during the 2027 Budget Stakeholders’ Consultative Engagement held at the University of Ibadan. He alleged that the funds had been earmarked for states but would not be released until after the 2027 general elections. According to the governor, Oyo State had already identified projects that could stimulate economic growth but would be unable to proceed if the funds remained withheld.

The Presidency, however, challenged the arithmetic behind the claim. It noted that ₦250 billion for each of Nigeria’s 36 states would amount to ₦9 trillion, excluding allocations to the Federal Government, the Federal Capital Territory and the 774 local government areas.

Under the Federation Account Allocation Committee formula, states receive 26.72 percent of distributable Federation Account revenue. Consequently, the Presidency estimated that NLNG dividends exceeding ₦33.68 trillion—approximately $25 billion—would have been required to generate ₦9 trillion for the states alone.

It further stated that NLNG had never paid $25 billion in dividends to the Federation Account in a single transaction. According to the statement, the company has paid approximately $21.5 billion to the Federation over the past 25 years, with less than $3 billion realised since President Bola Ahmed Tinubu assumed office.

The Presidency therefore argued that the alleged payout would exceed NLNG’s entire historical dividend contribution to the Federation, making the claim economically implausible. It maintained that the funds described by Governor Makinde as withheld could not represent a single NLNG dividend distribution of the size alleged.

Beyond disputing the figures, the statement criticised the governor’s public comments, accusing him of using misleading claims as part of his political activities. The Presidency referenced Makinde’s reported presidential ambition and urged him to provide verifiable facts rather than statements that could mislead the public or create distrust in the Federal Government.

The exchange highlights the continuing political tension surrounding revenue allocation, Federation Account disbursements and the management of national resources. With states facing substantial financial pressures and rising expectations from citizens, claims involving large public funds are likely to attract considerable attention.

The Presidency concluded by calling on Nigerians to disregard what it described as unfounded assertions, warning that such claims could generate unnecessary disaffection against the Federal authorities. Makinde’s position, however, has intensified public discussion about the transparency of NLNG dividends and the broader process through which revenues are distributed among Nigeria’s three tiers of government.

Continue Reading

News

Catholic Priest Regains Freedom After Abduction in Benue.

Ikechukwu Emmanuel

Published

on

Rev. Fr. John Inalegwu Otache, the Catholic priest abducted in Benue State, has reportedly regained his freedom following a rescue operation involving security personnel and local vigilantes.

Otache, Parish Priest of St. Margaret’s Parish, Ajegbe-Awume, in Ohimini Local Government Area, was kidnapped on Tuesday, October 13, 2026, along the Otobi Amejo-Ajegbe Road while returning from Otukpo.

His abduction caused widespread concern among members of the Catholic Diocese of Otukpo and residents of nearby communities, prompting prayers and appeals for his safe return.

The reported rescue has brought relief to his congregation, the wider Catholic community and others who had expressed concern about his whereabouts. However, details of the operation remain unclear, including the circumstances of his release and his current health condition.

Authorities and church officials are expected to provide further information as the situation develops.

Continue Reading

Trending

∧