News
Okpebholo stated that no native doctor or prophet can assert that he sought their assistance in winning the election.
In a recent address at Winner’s Chapel in Akho, Irrua, Governor Monday Okpebholo of Edo State revealed that he contested the September 21 governorship election without the aid of native doctors or prophets. This declaration was made during a worship service attended by prominent members of his administration.
Governor Okpebholo emphasized that his electoral success is a testament to his unwavering faith in God. He expressed gratitude for the divine support he believes has consistently guided him throughout his life and career. “I want to thank God for His wonderful deeds in my life, as no one can accomplish this except Him alone,” he stated, highlighting the importance of divine grace in his achievements.
He further asserted, “This is the first instance where someone has contested an election without seeking help from native doctors or prophets.” The Governor’s remarks reflect a broader sentiment of reliance on faith rather than traditional practices often associated with political success in Nigeria. He articulated a clear stance: “The only factor I recognize is God. If He cannot accomplish it, then let it not be done.”
In a landscape where many candidates resort to various strategies, including the influence of spiritual figures, Okpebholo’s assertion of faith as his sole guiding principle marks a significant departure. He concluded by expressing confidence in his community’s support, stating, “As a member of Winner’s Church, I am confident that we cannot be losers.”
Governor Okpebholo’s statements not only underscore his personal beliefs but also reflect a growing trend among some Nigerian politicians who seek to distance themselves from traditional spiritual practices in favor of a more faith-based approach to governance and leadership.
As of 12:01 a.m. ET on Saturday, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) began enforcing the 10% tariff imposed by President Trump on imports from numerous countries. Higher tariffs targeting 57 major trading partners are scheduled to follow next week.
This action represents a significant departure from the post-World War II framework of reciprocal tariff agreements. Kelly Ann Shaw, a trade lawyer at Hogan Lovells and former White House trade advisor, described the move as “the single biggest trade action of our lifetime.”
The announcement has already reverberated through global markets. By the close of trading on Friday, it had triggered a $5 trillion decline in the stock market valuation of 500 leading companies over two days. Oil and commodity prices also experienced sharp declines, with investors shifting capital into government bonds.
While a CBP bulletin indicated that no grace period would be granted for cargoes already en route at the time of implementation, a subsequent bulletin provides a 51-day grace period for goods loaded onto vessels or planes and in transit before 12:01 a.m. ET Saturday. The long-term economic implications of these tariffs remain to be seen.
Following a significant downturn in US markets, attributed to China’s recent imposition of reciprocal tariffs, Chinese Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Guo Jiakun has issued a statement urging the United States to reconsider its trade policies. In a Facebook post, Jiakun asserted that “the market has spoken,” suggesting a direct correlation between US protectionist measures and economic instability.
Jiakun further emphasized the need for “equal-footed consultation” to resolve trade differences, calling upon the US to “cease its wrongful actions.” This sentiment is echoed by several Chinese commerce associations representing key industries, who have issued statements encouraging diversification and warning of inflationary pressures within the United States as a result of the escalating tariffs.
The current escalation stems from a recent announcement by former President Donald Trump of an additional 34 per cent tariff on Chinese goods, prompting a swift retaliatory response from China, including further levies on American goods and restrictions on rare earth element exports. The situation remains tense, with both sides demonstrating a firm commitment to their respective positions.
Yesterday witnessed a demonstration at the University of Cross River State (UNICROSS) as students voiced their strong opposition to the recently implemented “No Fees, No Examinations” policy. The policy, which prevents students with outstanding fees from participating in examinations, has ignited widespread discontent amongst the student body.
Protesting students marched across campus, carrying placards and voicing concerns regarding the financial burden imposed by the university. Slogans like “Education is a Right, Not a Privilege” underscored the core argument against the policy.
Student representatives articulated the financial hardships faced by many, emphasizing the need for alternative solutions that do not impede academic progress. The university’s silence on the matter, exemplified by the refusal of University spokesman Onen Onen to comment, has further fueled student frustration. The situation remains unresolved, with the potential for continued unrest if a mutually agreeable solution is not reached.
